Tucker Carlson: “Chemtrails Are Real, It’s Clearly Not Water Vapor!”

By Noah Christopher

About 10 years ago, I started telling all of you about the TRUTH behind Chemtrails — namely, that they’re real, they’re not “water vapor”, they’re not “contrails”, they’re not normal or natural, we didn’t have them 75 years ago, and they are literally poisoning the air we breath.

Many people laughed at me….

Some got really angry (cognitive dissonance is one of the most powerful forces in the Universe)….

But I stayed the course, never wavering — standing firm and printing the TRUTH.

In fact, I started up a website documenting pictures of Chemtrails all over the world and it’s now the world’s largest database of Chemtrails — documenting the crime against humanity for posterity purposes!

And now 10 years later we are winning!

The truth is coming out, and Tucker Carlson and his guest Dane Wigington (who we’ve covered here many times before) and now telling you exactly what I’ve told you for 10 years — and they’re also saying that the Government will not be able to keep the lid on this scandal for much longer.

The truth is bursting up and it’s going to explode out very soon.

Watch this short clip from Tucker and Dane today:

And the full episode is below, I highly recommend it.

The truth is getting out, nice to see Tucker catching up to what we’ve been reporting for 10+ years (wink, wink)!

FULL EPISODE HERE:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

Tucker Carlson:

It’s always the obvious questions that are so vigorously discouraged. And one of the questions that’s been the most discouraged over the past 30 years is, what are those lines in the sky that you see trailing jets? What is that? Some people call them chemtrails and claim that somehow the U.S. government is spraying poison on the population. Those people are clearly crazy, Wikipedia calls them crazy, every news outlet calls them crazy, but the trails are still there and it’s clearly not water vapor because that doesn’t make sense at all. So what are they?

We spent the last six months trying to find someone credible who could explain that to us—a serious, sane person with an engineering background who could tell us what we are looking at, because we’re looking at something, and I don’t care what names you call me, I still want to know what it is. And we think we have found that person. Dane Wigington of Northern California has been on this subject for almost 30 years and has compiled what we believe, after looking at it pretty carefully, is the most comprehensive account of what we’re seeing. And it’s very bad.

Dane, thanks a lot for joining us. I never knew what to think of this topic. Are all these strange streaks in the sky chemicals being released into the air—chemtrails or contrails or the stripes in the sky that linger after airplanes pass? I don’t remember them as a child; they’re very common now. I’ve heard people say there’s something up, something nefarious going on.

So I go to Wikipedia to see what they say, and I want to read you the Wikipedia entry—the first part of it on this question. Okay, you may have seen this, and I’m quoting from Wikipedia as of this morning: “The chemtrail conspiracy theory is the erroneous belief that long-lasting condensation trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft are actually ‘chemtrails’ consisting of chemical or biological agents sprayed for nefarious purposes undisclosed to the general public.” Believers in this conspiracy theory say that while normal contrails dissipate relatively quickly, contrails that linger must contain additional substances. Those who subscribe to the theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be solar radiation management, weather modification, psychological manipulation, human population control, biological or chemical warfare, or testing of a biological or chemical agent on the population, and that the trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.

So I read that, and the purpose, of course, of that paragraph is not to illuminate what this might be, but to attack anyone who speculates about what it might be. It’s a form itself of psychological warfare, of propaganda. And when I read that, I said to myself, there’s clearly something going on, because the people who control Wikipedia—which would be the intel agencies, as we know—don’t want anyone to talk about this. So with that lengthy preface explaining why this conversation is taking place, I will turn it over to you to explain: what are these lines in the sky that we have all seen?

Dane Wigington:

They’re sprayed particulate dispersion. There is no theory in this equation. Bottom line: we have up-close film footage of these aircraft at altitude—KC-10s, KC-135s, C-17 Globemasters—with nozzles visible, turning dispersions on and off. This is not “condensation.” GeoengineeringWatch.org is the only entity that has taken a NOAA flying lab—National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration—top scientists in it, to sample what these heavy aircraft are emitting at altitude. That sample was processed at Rensselaer Polytechnic in New York, one of the world’s most renowned testing institutions.

We found exactly what we knew we would find, starting with aluminum nanoparticles. Bioavailable, free-form aluminum is toxic to all life—period. That element is named in numerous climate engineering patents as part of a geoengineering dispersion element. So again, there’s no theory involved in any of this. And what’s so incredibly profound in this equation, Tucker: you have the entire global climate science community, governments all over the world, saying we need to put aircraft in the air immediately to disperse light-scattering particles.

We use the science terms at GeoengineeringWatch.org because the “chemtrails” term is the instant marginalization term by design. You bring that term up, any elected official won’t talk to you anymore; media will immediately marginalize you. Solar radiation management, stratospheric aerosol injection, cloud albedo enhancement, climate engineering—if we stick to the science terms, they can’t marginalize us. So again, this elephant in the sky that we are told is a conspiracy theory is exactly what the entire global climate science community says we need to deploy immediately to slow down the warming of the planet.

The stated purpose is to deflect some of the sun’s incoming thermal energy. We know these programs, not surprisingly, are making a bad situation worse, not better. And, Tucker, they’re being used as a form of warfare. We know that we have countries like Iran constantly demonized. Of course, as you well know, immediately after 9/11 we have the list of countries to be targeted given to General Wesley Clark—a list that clearly existed before 9/11 even occurred.

Subsequently, every one of those countries endured a once-in-1,000-year drought. Statistically, mathematically, that’s impossible without climate intervention operations. And we have the leader of Iran on the floor of the U.N., on film, on the record, stating NATO was cutting off their precipitation. We have Iranian top scientists recently stating NATO’s been doing this for 40 years. Destabilize the food supply by destabilizing the rain, and you destabilize the population.

Tucker Carlson:

So you just said a bunch of amazing things—all of which, I just want to say, sound plausible to me. But let’s just back up a little bit. So you’re calling this “geoengineering.” The term “chemtrails,” you say, is a propaganda term designed to discredit people who ask sincere questions about what the hell am I looking at. If anybody is unfamiliar with the issue and they Google that term, they’ll get what you got, and that’s what we try to avoid.

So we try to point out: semantics matter in this case. Okay, so the first line of the Wikipedia entry points out something true, which is that when you look at these lines in the sky and you’re told, “Well, it’s just condensation; it’s water vapor,” you know that maybe that’s not the right explanation, because water vapor dissipates and doesn’t remain in the sky for, like, 20 minutes after the plane leaves. That suggests bigger particles in the mist—the particulate matter in the mist. Is that correct?

Dane Wigington:

Exactly correct. If you see, for example, breath condensing—if you see some researchers in the Arctic and their breath is condensing because it’s very cold—do they get a cloud starting to form over their head? If you have a vehicle whose exhaust is condensing in the morning, do you have a freeway with giant clouds hanging over it from the condensation from the vehicles in some cold region? No. That’s not how condensation behaves.

And again, my journey into this whole battle of now 27 years started when I built my off-grid home in Northern California, middle of the wilderness. It was the cover of the world’s largest renewable energy magazine. I have solar, wind, and hydro. And I was losing, on some days, from what these aircraft were emitting, 50, 60, even 70% of my solar uptake.

I knew that could not be condensation. When I began to research, I was very surprised at the mountain of information on geoengineering and solar radiation management. I looked for primary elements. I began to test my precipitation. I hoped I would not find these elements in my rain, because I knew if I did, it would change the entire course of my life.

I cannot look the other way. I came up with seven parts per billion in my first rain test. Over the next 18 months—because I took that long researching before I was willing to speak out on this issue—at the end of 18 months, I had single rain events with 3,450 parts per billion of aluminum in my rain. This is bioavailable, free-form aluminum, which is toxic to all life forms—period—primary element named in climate engineering patents. And we have the world’s most recognized geoengineers specifically stating, on film, on the record, their goal of using aluminum in these programs because of its high reflectivity—with no consideration of the consequences.

That’s how I got into this battle. So if I understand what you’re saying, what we’re watching is an attempt—I assume by governments, and we’ll get into who’s doing this—to mitigate the effects of climate change, to reflect back rays from the sun so that the earth doesn’t warm at a pace that is dangerous to whatever they think it’s dangerous to. That is the stated purpose. We know that is the stated purpose.

Tucker Carlson:

So I think that’s plausible because there is so much energy—commitment, sincere commitment in some cases, obviously fake commitment in others—and so much money behind this effort to mitigate global warming that that makes absolute sense. It is a religion. And you’re saying that you were not originally aware of this or interested in it, but because you live off-grid and you derive a lot of your electricity from solar and you clearly have an engineer brain, you were wondering, like, why the hell is my solar not working correctly? And that got you into this process of learning about it.

Dane Wigington:

Correct. And I have friends in the solar industry who, off the record, inform me that some of the commercial solar plants are producing half their design output, and they won’t talk about why because they don’t want to lose subsidies. So again, this is a very known element in many fields. In fact, with the nation’s weathermen—National Weather Service and NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration—there is an illegal federal gag order on all agency operations with those two entities.

Why would our government feel the need to gag the weathermen? I had NOAA scientists state to my face, quote: “We all know this is going on. We have no First Amendment protection. We don’t know what to do.” So the bottom line is, let’s all just pretend this isn’t going on while it’s virtually dismantling the planet’s primary life support systems and ubiquitously contaminating everything everywhere.

We’re not just talking about aluminum. We have—in lab tests, and again we’ve done hundreds of lab tests; we did 500 working with the University of Minnesota, an internationally recognized agricultural institution—aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, surfactants, polymer fibers, graphene. All of this coming down in our breathable air column. Tucker, that’s horrifying.

Tucker Carlson:

So who’s doing this specifically? Who is behind this?

Dane Wigington:

Ultimately, all roads lead to those who print the money. But we know, as far as the coordinating entities: certainly DoD, DARPA. We have documents to prove the existence of these programs going back decades—documents hundreds of pages long. We have an 800-page U.S. Senate document from 1978 outlining the scope and scale of these programs then, specifically calling for intergovernmental cooperation—even between “otherwise adversarial nations”—because of the cross-border ramifications of these programs.

You can’t just geoengineer over your own country. Who’s the biggest player? Obviously the United States of America, because of the size of our military. The U.S. military has three times more aerial tankers—which are the primary aircraft used in these operations—than all other militaries in the world combined.

And if I could back up to the whole condensation-trail narrative again—which is perhaps one of the greatest lies ever perpetrated on populations all over the world—all military tankers and all commercial aircraft are equipped with what’s known as a high-bypass turbofan jet engine. That’s a jet-powered fan. Ninety percent of the air that moves through that engine is not combusted. So by design, that engine is nearly incapable of producing any condensation material except under rare and extreme circumstances, which are diminishing by the day because of the warming that’s occurring in the troposphere.

So much warming. We’ve had two former military pilots who fly private aircraft—important people—contact us at GeoengineeringWatch.org. In both cases, they were off the coast of the Pacific Northwest, and their aircraft were forced into emergency auto-descents because the air outside that aircraft was 45 to 50 degrees above what it should have been. The air was not dense enough to carry those aircraft. These people are very, very alarmed but very afraid to speak out.

Tucker Carlson:

Well, that’s an amazing fact, and it points up something that I think is indisputably true, which is the climate is changing. Why it’s changing is a whole separate set of debates—of course it’s always changed. But climate engineering alone—if I could elaborate—I mean, climate engineering alone, and I’m not negating the other sources of damage to the planet; we’ve been very poor stewards. Our point at GeoengineeringWatch.org is: how could anybody, from any perspective—and the environmental left is the most reluctant to face this issue, and we know why, Tucker, because they don’t want to lose their 501(c)(3) nonprofits.

Our attorneys at GeoengineeringWatch.org spoke to attorneys from every major environmental group—Greenpeace, Sierra Club, WWF—all of them. They will not address this issue because they don’t want to lose their nonprofit status. Is that not criminal hypocrisy? So we’re stating that in the case of trapping more heat than it deflects, these programs are causing far more harm than any perceived good. They’re simply using it as a weapon under the guise of trying to mitigate the climate.

Dane Wigington:

So again, these operations are taking us from the frying pan into the fire, so to speak. The greatest, most damaging form of human activity on the planet at this moment in time must be considered these operations—climate engineering. Well, sure. I mean, geoengineering by its very nature is just like textbook hubris—where you think you’re God and you’re in charge of the weather and the planet. No—you’re just some lumpy, furry schmuck living out an incredibly short lifespan with no ability to make anything better, because you’re not God.

Tucker Carlson:

Just the whole mindset is the mindset that gets us to nuclear war, so I’m opposed to it on those grounds. But before we ascend too much higher, let’s just come back down a little bit and to the specifics. What is the government’s position on climate engineering? Where are these aircraft taking off from? Where do these chemicals come from—the aluminum particulate, the magnesium, all the rest you described? What’s the chain that gets us to the stripes in the sky that we see?

Dane Wigington:

Aircraft are taking off from countless locations. We’re aware of a number of military bases where we know they’re deploying from. We also have commercial aircraft with commercial markings that we know are being used in these operations. We know that because we have film footage of these aircraft: retrofit nozzles mounted on the wing pylons; we have up-close photographs aimed into the exhaust jetstream to make this look like “condensation.”

We are not implicating commercial pilots or personnel, but we are communicating with them. Some commercial pilots distribute our printed materials in pilot lunchrooms, for example, covertly, because they know their aircraft are being used. These are automated systems. They carry a small payload. You might remember: around the year 2000 the weight of the aircraft became a very big deal—how much luggage you carried on, how much weight you carried on. That appears to be when this was implemented.

And we also know that the DoD has leased a significant number of commercial aircraft with commercial markings. Why would the DoD need or want that? For the base material—because we’re talking about an extraordinary amount of material here—based on our testing with the University of Minnesota (about 500 lab tests) and extrapolating how much material was in the precipitation and projecting that globally, it appears something in the range of 40 to 60 million tons of nanoparticles are being dispersed annually in skies all over the globe. The smaller the particle, the more toxic it is, the more harmful it is, the more bioavailable it is.

All the official air quality testing, by design, doesn’t even look for these elements, let alone disclose them. Official air quality testing is PM10—10 microns—occasionally PM2.5. Those are boulders compared to a nanoparticle. You can fit up to 100,000 nanoparticles across the width of a single human hair. They’re inconceivably small.

The reason they use such small particles is because they stay aloft longer—and that’s the goal. Keep the particles suspended in the atmosphere, and there’s more volumetric forcing—there’s more surface area the smaller the particle for a given amount of material. It appears—and we have a published study on this—there is a peer-reviewed published study that implicates coal fly ash as a base material for these operations, because it contains many of the elements the climate engineers feel they need to disperse in our skies. It provides plausible deniability, and it gets rid of the waste product they’re always trying to get rid of.

There are other elements added. American Elements Corporation appears to be one of the primary suppliers for these operations. But again, the fact that this can go on in our skies, with the mountain of data that exists on this, and the continued pretending by the so-called climate science community that this isn’t ongoing, is mind-numbing. They won’t be able to hide this for much longer.

Tucker Carlson:

I’m not necessarily surprised. What I am surprised by, however, is the fact that this program—the one you’re describing—could have continued for over 60 years at this scale, continental and global scale, and no one knows about it or talks about it. I mean, you know, we have a huge government, lots of elected officials. Like, what do they say when you ask them?

Dane Wigington:

This is a bit like the “safe and effective” narrative, isn’t it? Let’s have the entire medical community pretending that injecting toxic heavy metals is safe and effective, and they still pretend to this day that’s the case—when it doesn’t take a large intellect or an educated individual to understand that’s going to do harm. And yet that narrative still continues to this day. So again, this mass psychosis of denial is mind-numbing.

But you can’t hide this for much longer. We do have the climate science community now starting to speak out, starting to state how incredibly catastrophic these programs would be if they were implemented. They’re not outright admitting it yet, but they’re getting closer. And if you look at historical precedent: when did the U.S. military start its modification in hurricanes? There are some interesting things going on on the hurricane front this year—as in, none of them. They’re being deflected.

People who pretend that you can’t manipulate a weather system of that size—that’s absolute nonsense. The science completely disputes that. The U.S. military commenced its hurricane modification operations in 1947 with Project Cirrus, and even the results of that initial small-scale testing appeared to have so much effect on a cyclonic rotation that there were lawsuits pending from that—at which time they began to be more covert about their operations.

Tucker Carlson:

And you said you’ll notice that there aren’t hurricanes in Florida. So, the last few years, Florida—the west coast of Florida in particular—has been hammered, absolutely destroyed; tens of billions of dollars of damage done by hurricanes. No hurricanes this year. And you’re saying that that’s not an accident. Is that what you’re saying?

Dane Wigington:

I’m saying that we know the technology exists to steer storms of that size. Let me make a comparison: you could have a 10-year-old child divert the course of a 100,000-ton freight train by pulling a lever and changing the tracks. That’s the kind of small input, massive output you can have with these cyclonic rotations when they have the ability to manipulate atmospheric pressure zones. This is undisputed, patented science.

So why would we think they’re not using these types of operations? We have historical precedent. Project Popeye in Vietnam was so successful at controlling precipitation that in 1976 they passed the ENMOD treaties forbidding weather manipulation for wartime purposes—but not over a country’s own population. If we look at that—

Tucker Carlson:

Can I ask you to stop? I’m sorry, you’re throwing—I’m so ignorant on this topic, but I’m suddenly very interested, and I just want to make sure we don’t miss anything. Operation Popeye—is that what you called it in Vietnam? I’ve never even heard of that; I’m embarrassed to say. What is it? What was it?

Dane Wigington:

Very easily researched historical record: the U.S. military was so successful at controlling precipitation over Vietnam that the international community was very concerned about this—at least on the surface. They passed Environmental Modification (ENMOD) treaties in 1976, international treaties forbidding weather manipulation in wartime. So when people claim this is conspiracy—that we don’t have this kind of power and control—and they try to muddy the climate engineering issue by conflating it with localized, publicized cloud-seeding operations, those are two completely different animals.

We see even some state legislators doing the same, and we’re trying to correct that at GeoengineeringWatch.org because we’re working with numerous state legislators now and have been. There’s legislation pending in 36 states to ban geoengineering over their skies. Tennessee and Florida have already done so. But we’re correcting them and giving them an accurate compass heading: the localized, publicized cloud-seeding operations—which they tried to implicate in the Texas floods that killed so many young Americans—are virtually meaningless in comparison to climate engineering. It’s an ant compared to an elephant.

Intentionally, those that control media and are trying to control the narrative are trying to confuse these two issues. They are completely different. They’re trying to mask or hide the elephant in the sky, which is climate engineering operations. These programs are historical record.

The Chinese government has been so successful at, for example, engineering snowstorms—Tucker, do you remember the blizzard in New Orleans this January? The blizzard in Florida? Blizzards on the Gulf Coast? That was January 21st, by the way. These are demonstrations of what climate engineering can do.

The Chinese government has long since openly stated they were engineering snowstorms with endothermic reacting elements—patented elements that can literally transition what should be a liquid precipitation event (a rain event) into snow. Think of the cold pack in a first-aid kit that sits on a shelf at room temperature for 20 years: you mix the pack together and you have ice instantly. That’s an endothermic reaction. Yes, that’s being introduced into cloud moisture.

They were so successful in China, they caused billions of dollars of damage to Beijing, at which time they began to be less open about this. Everybody covered it—CNN, Popular Science, The Guardian. But if you bring that up here, suddenly you’re a tinfoil-hat-wearing nutcase. On that same day, while it was blizzarding in New Orleans, in the polar regions—Alaska, Greenland, Iceland, Siberia—it was above freezing and raining.

Do you remember the deep freeze in Texas, Tucker, a few years ago? When it was below zero in Dallas, it was 33 degrees warmer at the North Pole. Think about that. That’s what we’re not told.

So, the COP climate conferences—the international climate conferences—are not to change business as usual; they are to force countries to actively or passively participate in climate engineering. At some of those conferences—the Cancun conference, the Copenhagen conference—we had record low temperatures at the time of the conference in spite of above-normal temperatures in surrounding areas. That’s a demonstration of what climate engineering can do.

Back to the hurricanes: the deflection of hurricanes so far this year—is that a demonstration to other countries as well of the power that the U.S. military has to manipulate atmospheric pressure zones? These are patented processes. For listeners who’ve heard of HAARP in Alaska—that’s an ionosphere heater. It transmits power to the electrically charged ionosphere, causing an electrical chain reaction. They’re literally using the atmosphere as a physics lab.

You know of Project Starfish Prime and Project Fishbowl—U.S. military experiments with detonating hydrogen bombs in the magnetosphere, which they thought could collapse the whole atmosphere. Did that stop them? No. Installations like HAARP are used to control atmospheric pressure zones.

Back to the hurricanes: if you can manipulate atmospheric pressure zones with these directional ionosphere heaters, you can manipulate their path. Is that what we see going on? Is that a demonstration to others right now? Does the administration want to avoid a big hurricane cataclysm since they’ve gutted emergency protections? We don’t know—we can speculate—but the fact that there is nothing we can call natural at this point is indisputable.

Tucker Carlson:

A couple different threads. One, the U.S. military, in this country, runs propaganda operations against our population, and they do it on social media and through conventional media as well, and they have for a long time—but it’s certainly gotten more aggressive. That’s illegal, immoral; anyone who participates should be in prison. But it happens, and unfortunately we haven’t been able to stop it.

We know they lie to our population about a whole bunch of things, including what they’re doing. Two, we know that in the past 15 years you see these kind of fat, effeminate generals talking about how climate change is one of the main national security threats and the purpose of the U.S. military is to fight climate change. There’s been a lot of that, and it’s very confusing to people like me who think the purpose of the U.S. military is shooting people trying to invade our country. What does climate change have to do with national security?

Dane Wigington:

Your description suddenly makes it all make sense. A lot of what they do is trying to mitigate—or say they’re trying to mitigate—the effects of climate change. I would call it masking the effects, because they’re certainly not mitigating it. Everything they do—every short-term toxic surface cool-down—comes at the cost of a worsened overall warming and damage to the planet.

You’re completely correct, Tucker, in the U.S. military’s top brass statements on the record that they consider the collapsing climate system the greatest national security threat of all. When we have so many military bases at sea level, some of which are already being inundated, that’s part of the problem. But you have other elements: the ozone layer is near functional collapse right now. It’s not the hairspray cans.

The single greatest damaging factor is climate engineering—period. Not just the oxidizing particles being dispersed in our atmosphere, but the manipulation of those particles with extremely powerful frequency transmissions. Of all the towers being put up everywhere for “communications”—fake trees and all the forms they come in—we know many of those installations are being supplied with ten times more power than they need. That’s part of my background in the electrical field.

I know people who work on these towers—ten times more power than they need for communications. Why do they need that much power? And we know these facilities are being used to manipulate the electrically conductive atmospheric particulates. There’s a repelling effect caused from these transmissions; we can see the effect on water vapor loops.

If we look at the flash flooding in Texas as an example that killed so many young Americans, we captured in real time—I’m still surprised we have access to these data loops—the transmissions from the NEXRAD network that are used to manipulate weather systems. Because of the repelling effect of those transmissions, when there was that convective cell over that location and transmitters energized all around that cell—and we recorded that; it’s posted—it held that cell in one place. It precipitated out in one location.

We can speculate about agendas and objectives; we can’t know that. But the fact that that storm was manipulated is beyond dispute. Same with Hurricane Helene—we recorded frequency transmissions manipulating that storm and steering it into place. It’s indisputable; these are patented technologies.

Hurricane Harvey—we recorded that. How did meteorologists know seven days in advance that Hurricane Harvey was going to go where it went and sit there for three days? How could they possibly know that? Frequency transmissions held it there. We recorded that in real time.

These people are reading scripts, Tucker. They’re literally reading scripts passed down to them by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin—private defense contractors neck-deep in climate engineering: patents, operations—everything. They literally supply the “forecast,” which is the scheduled weather, to the National Weather Service and NOAA—our nation’s weathermen. That passes all the way down.

Local meteorologists know how long their leash is; they’re protecting their paychecks and pensions. They toe the line as well—just like “safe and effective” in the medical community—everybody toes the line because they don’t want to disrupt their personal paradigm. These storms are being steered and manipulated—period. That’s beyond dispute.

Tucker Carlson:

I’m glad you keep bringing up the COVID vax, because it would be hard for my middle-aged brain to accept a lie at this scale—like, how could you hide something this big, this profound, from an entire population? Except I just saw it five years ago with the COVID vax, which was a total lie, and now there’s no dispute that they lied about it. But no one was ever punished, and most people believed it. So I know for a fact what you’re describing is possible.

Can you—well, actually, before I forget, let me ask: who pays you to do this? Why are you doing this? This sounds like quite an operation that you’re running. You’re clearly not in it for the money. This is a bigger movement than I was aware of until right now.

So you’re running lab tests on rainwater; you’re researching this actively. Is this a volunteer effort? How and why are you doing this?

Dane Wigington:

Because I can find no greater point for existing. How can I possibly look the other way? I was restoring habitat in Northern California, the east side of Lake Shasta—habitat that was decimated by irresponsible logging practices. I wanted to do that the rest of my life. I wanted to plant trees and watch them grow the rest of my life.

There’s no greater solitude than what I was doing. But how was I to continue doing that, knowing what I knew, when the solar output reduction happened that I mentioned earlier? I began to test rain, knowing the implications of toxic rain—rain that contained aluminum. By the way, aluminum doesn’t just kill soil microbiome; it affects tree root systems. This is peer-reviewed study: bioavailable aluminum shuts down nutrient uptake.

So the trees die a slow, protracted death, and all official agencies blame beetles. “The trees are dying because of the beetles.” The bottom line is beetles are a symptom of a sick, dying tree. My father was an arborist. I know trees. I love trees.

When I was in kindergarten, they had to come out after recess and drag me out of the tree because I didn’t want to come down. With no trees, no people—that’s simple, right? So how was I to continue doing that? I can’t look myself in the mirror. I can’t look my children in the eyes. How could I not do this?

Tucker Carlson:

The mass death of insects and trees around the globe—bees are collapsing, right?

Dane Wigington:

We know this year we were told 70% collapse this year. That’s staggering; that’s incredibly alarming. But what’s the real figure? The real figure is that’s a 70% collapse of the 20% that was remaining—we’re down to single-digit percentages of pollinators left right now.

We know insect populations have declined—terrestrial and aquatic—80 to 90% globally. It’s very noticeable. If you don’t believe it, remember the windshield on your parents’ station wagon as a child in the summertime was covered in bugs. I drive in a rural area every night: no bugs. That’s real. No bugs, no people.

Also, we publicized this in 2012 with former government scientists who could speak out because they’re retired; the science community tried to marginalize us, and now they’ve had to admit it. If your listeners search “insect apocalypse,” they’ll find alarms going off all over the globe. This translates to plankton as well—no plankton, no people. We have peer-reviewed science study now for the Atlantic: plankton population is down 90%. Other oceans are not far behind.

That’s the greatest oxygen producer on the planet; that’s the base of life on Earth—plankton. The human race right now, Tucker—I’ve used this example before, but it’s accurate—it’s like occupants of a car parked on the railroad track. The train is seconds from impact, lights flashing, horn blaring, and they’re trying to decide what station to put the radio on. No matter what other issue we’re facing, I would argue power-structure maneuvering—from conflict zones to carnage zones—is directly related to the unfolding and accelerating biosphere collapse, which climate engineering is fueling, not mitigating.

They will not let go of this covert weapon of control. It is the crown-jewel weapon with which they can bring populations to their knees, including our own, without those populations ever knowing they’re under assault. They’re not going to let go of this weapon. As for our military brothers and sisters participating in this—many ask, “Why would they?”—they took an oath to protect their populations from all threats, foreign and domestic. They’re being compartmentalized.

They’re being told these programs are benevolent and necessary—just like the pilots in Vietnam, I’m sure, were told when they were spraying Agent Orange on everybody. They weren’t told, “This is going to kill your comrade on the ground.” Of course not. Here we are.

Tucker Carlson:

And I think, in a lot of cases, people don’t know; they don’t think it through. They’re so high on this false feeling of omnipotence—“we’re in charge, we have the technology, we can make things better.” People delude themselves; good people delude themselves into committing evil because they think they have this power that they actually don’t have.

So, okay, the bees start disappearing; the bats; insects; plankton—these are all phenomena that most people are not going to notice because they live in cities. But the trees dying is very obvious. These are plants that live for 100 years, and all of a sudden they’re dying. The fir trees are dying. Give us a sense of American forestry right now. How are the trees in this country?

Dane Wigington:

The more important statistic might be global at this point, because we have that statistic. Tree cover has declined since pre-civilization baselines—66%. Sixty-six percent gone. The remaining one-third is dead and dying. We’ve changed atmospheric chemistry so much, forests do not smell like forests anymore.

Anybody who knows trees, who knows what forests once smelled like, knows that scent is gone. Why is it gone? Because of the now intense UV radiation that’s bombarding the planet. We’re getting, by the way, UVC at the surface. I mentioned the ozone layer collapse—climate engineering is the single greatest factor.

The climate science community acknowledges this. They acknowledge openly that if we geoengineer—as if we haven’t been for 80 years already—these programs would destroy the ozone layer. We had a former NASA contract engineer working directly for GeoengineeringWatch.org with state-of-the-art metering equipment into five figures, which we supplied—and again, we do this out of pocket. Our film The Dimming—the groundbreaking documentary, 26 million views—non-monetized, posted for free the day it was done. I’m in this for the cause.

If we don’t win this battle, nothing else matters. Back to the trees: forests don’t smell like forests anymore because the trees are shutting their stomata—that’s the respiratory port on the trees allowing them to breathe, to feed on carbon, to release oxygen. They are not respirating. They’re dying a slow, protracted death.

That’s the second greatest oxygen producer on the planet. From every conceivable direction, climate engineering is pounding the nails into our collective coffins. They will not let go of this covert weapon of control. For those who say, “They wouldn’t do this to themselves,” they already have. We detonated 2,400 nuclear bombs on the planet.

How many people know that the Nevada detonations—which they did in secrecy—we now know from peer-reviewed study: the downwind fallout from the Nevada nuclear bomb detonations killed no less than 700,000 Americans. That’s peer-reviewed study. How many people know that?

As far as biological testing: according to The Washington Post, as of 1977, the U.S. military had conducted no less than 239 open-air biological tests on innocent, unknowing civilians. Look it up. This is historical record covered by mainstream media.

Tucker Carlson:

We had a revolution over a tea tax. You can’t put up with this. I encourage all of your listeners to look up every single thing you state—very easy to find. It’s clear from the statistics you’re citing you’re not shooting from the hip.

Dane Wigington:

Let’s look at Zbigniew Brzezinski—a former U.S. presidential adviser going back to Johnson. He stated, on the record—your listeners can look this up easily as well: with today’s technology, it’s far easier to kill a million people than to control them. Do you think these people are here to help? Really?

The amount of layers with this issue is immense, and there are many legitimate concerns. If we don’t deal with what’s happening in our skies, we’re not going to be here long. On CO₂: the world’s second most recognized climate engineer, Dr. Ken Caldeira—former DoD scientist—we own audio of him at GeoengineeringWatch.org, in his words, stating that what he did for the DoD was design methods of spraying pathogens into clouds to infect the populations below.

We know in the outbreak of COVID-19, at one point 85 countries were infected in three days. That’s indicative of an airborne dispersion. Italian researchers found COVID-19 attached to airborne particulate. Do not all these dots connect? They certainly appear so.

From our precipitation testing with RPI in New York, we have polymer fibers and graphene in our rain. Graphene is like a vascular machete. It’s listed in geoengineering patents for certain purposes. Those two elements are also used militarily as biological carrier platforms to carry a pathogen from the clouds to the ground to infect the population below. Why is that in our rain right now?

Could they, at any point of their choosing, put something much more lethal into the precipitation and level the playing field? Certainly they could.

Tucker Carlson:

Have you spoken to elected officials about this—members of Congress?

Dane Wigington:

Many, and I continue to. Many know. I’ve had private meetings with Gavin Newsom at the California State Capitol—his top aide—and not that that individual would ever do anything for the common good; he wouldn’t. He’s there to serve those who have him on the end of their strings. No response there.

Tucker Carlson:

So you actually said this—or a version of this—to Gavin Newsom, the governor of California?

Dane Wigington:

Yes. And I conveyed to Newsom that if these programs were allowed to continue—because I was focused more on California and the impact here—the drought catastrophes in California would be catastrophic. I supplied data, which he didn’t try to dispute. I’ve had meetings with California Energy Commission scientists as well, air quality scientists.

California’s been concerned about the lack of precipitation, which affects hydropower production; also affects Hoover Dam, Canyon Dam. In presentations I gave well over a decade ago—Engineered Drought Catastrophe, Target California—everything I said then is more relevant now than ever. I presented that data to Newsom, and the drought has continued, which they’re not even disclosing now. Even in Northern California right now, they show “zero drought.” That’s a blatant, glaring statistical falsification. It has never been drier here in regard to soil moisture and fire fuel moisture.

They’re lying about everything. They’re lying about the UV readings on the surface—blatant, glaring lies. Their meters—every aspect of this equation—are disposing and metering only down to 300 nanometers in regard to the UV spectrum. That’s half of the UVB spectrum. No UVC is even metered for, let alone disclosed.

Same as the air quality particulates—PM10 is looked for, nothing below that. I’ve had California state air quality officials in a closed-door meeting—five of them—tell me to my face: “The system is rigged. We’re testing for combustion particulates only; the rest goes out the window.” The whole system is designed to not show the immensity of damage being done.

Tucker Carlson:

Is the government using wildfires as a climate engineering weapon?

Dane Wigington:

They know. The Palisades fire, as an example—the ability for the climate engineers to shut off precipitation is far greater than their ability to augment it. They can shut down rain as long as they want, as we know from Middle Eastern countries—as I stated on Iran. In the case of the Palisades: no rain for eight months. That’s not an accident.

These particulates are incendiaries. Aluminum nanoparticles are such an effective incendiary they’re used in military demolitions—thermite. That incendiary dust coats the forest floor, coats foliage, and when it builds up over time, everything becomes more volatile. I spoke about atmospheric pressure zones, which they can and are manipulating. In doing so, they can manipulate surface wind flows, creating extreme zonal wind-flow patterns—the same as they did in Lahaina.

Extremely anomalous low-pressure zones—one to the north—and an engineered high-pressure zone to the south; Hurricane Dora. Between those two, you create a bellows effect—a blowtorch effect. Whatever the source of ignition—many online speculate—what’s setting the template for these fires to burn with such ferocity? That is definitely climate engineering.

We found a 140-page U.S. military document—posted—titled Wildfires as a Military Weapon. Within that document, 17 sites were named in the U.S. as study zones. L.A. was one. It described exactly the type of pre-preparation that we see happening in all these locations. Lahaina was declared a “flash drought” zone a week prior to that incineration.

We can speculate on agendas and objectives being carried out. The fact that climate engineering is inseparable from these equations is absolutely indisputable. That document, by the way, is also posted at GeoengineeringWatch.org with the important sections highlighted. Shocking data.

Tucker Carlson:

Has there been any attempt to push back legislatively? Has Congress ever taken this up?

Dane Wigington:

Yes. We have 36 states with legislation in some process. Two states have already passed it. I’m communicating with an aide to DeSantis; I’ve had an hour conference call with Dr. Ladapo there on the issue. We have some very rational people involved.

Marjorie Taylor Greene just addressed this; that was publicized. We tried to reach Mrs. Greene before this to give some compass heading, because if you fly into this blind, you can do more harm than good. One thing we encourage—and unfortunately Marjorie didn’t get this message; we hope she does at some point—don’t open the entire climate scenario and mix it with this issue. Keep the focus on climate engineering.

When there’s a denial of the other sources of damage to the planet, that tends to immediately alienate half the people we need in this battle. What we encourage other legislators to do is: if the subject of the climate comes up, say, “How can we have any legitimate discussion of climate anything, from any perspective, without first and foremost addressing this elephant in the equation?” That narrative is much more productive at building bridges instead of burning them.

Tucker Carlson:

So, I knew the climate was changing, because I pay attention to nature. You’ve just single-handedly convinced me that a lot of this is driven by human activity—just not your suburban hairspray. It’s driven by the U.S. military.

Dane Wigington:

It’s both—I want to stress again, we’re not denying at GeoengineeringWatch.org that we’re putting about 100 million tons of carbon into the air a day, burning 26 million tons of coal and 100 million barrels of hydrocarbon. We’re cutting down forests, paving the planet, poisoning the oceans—all of these have an effect. We’re acknowledging that. But we’re saying when we have intentional intervention which has prevented the planet from responding to the damage done—if it weren’t for toxic rain, the forests may have tried to uptake more of that carbon and keep things more in balance, but they can’t.

The trees can’t; their root systems are being poisoned; soil microbiome is being poisoned; the ozone layer is being destroyed. These programs are literally disabling the planet’s counterbalancing life-support systems. We will never know now how much better a position we would have been in had climate engineering—aka weather warfare—never been deployed. We will now never know.

Those in power do not care about the consequences of their actions—even to themselves. Psychoanalysis specifically cites the kind of personality disorders common with those in power: a near total lack of comprehension as to the consequences of their actions, even to themselves. That’s a power addict. Does an addict care the next fix may kill? They don’t care.

At this point, it’s a runaway train. For many who say, “They would never do this to themselves,” they already have. We know this from the nuclear scenario I outlined. If I could tie one more dot together—because it’s important and an existential threat—climate engineering is decimating the planet’s primary protective life-support system, starting with the ozone layer.

Now we’re much more susceptible to a CME—a coronal mass ejection, solar flare. If we have an event like the Carrington Event in the 1800s, that would shut down grid power around the world. Now we have nuclear plants that can’t cool themselves. Now we have Fukushima times 100 or 200—game over. Again, directly connected to climate engineering.

Tucker Carlson:

Is climate engineering impacting Earth’s animal population? What about mammals—do you notice any effect?

Dane Wigington:

Yes. We have peer-reviewed study of whales with extraordinary amounts of aluminum in their tissue. Where’s that coming from? This is bioavailable aluminum.

Debunkers say “aluminum’s a very common element,” which it is—the third most abundant in the earth’s strata—but it does not exist in free form naturally—period. It’s always bonded to other elements. That’s the part they leave out. Even whales are absorbing this same material, having an obvious effect.

Global wildlife populations are down, conservatively, about 75% in the last four years alone—that’s 75% of an already depleted population. The giant herds of caribou—some were a million strong—are down to 5,000 or less from a million. Virtual crash. We have extraordinary images from what chemical ice nucleation can do.

An endothermic reaction is profound, too. We have images of hundreds of waterfowl frozen solid to the surface of a lake—how does that happen? You’ve seen the massive baseball- and softball-size hail falling everywhere—so much so that insurance companies are canceling hail coverage now because it’s increased so profoundly. That’s chemical ice nucleation.

The extreme form—if your listeners search “Lake Michigan ice balls,” they can see the shores of Lake Michigan coated with 75-pound, perfectly spherical ice balls. They don’t fall that big from the sky; they form in the lake because they’re chemically nucleating over the Great Lakes constantly. That’s how they pile up massive amounts of snow in Erie and Buffalo and make sensationalized headlines. You can literally throw a rock to no snow, but they only show the four or five feet of snow in Erie and Buffalo and sensationalize, “Look how much snow,” while we’re 80 degrees at the top of the Sierras in the middle of winter in California.

They don’t publicize that. In 2014, Boston had record lows and sensational snow. What didn’t they tell us? Middle of winter, while Boston was buried in snow, there was literally no snow 14,000 feet up in the Sierras. They never told us that, did they?

There’s a perception aspect to keep business as usual until the last possible moment—until the moment of impact—retaining power while using weather as a weapon. The crops are shutting down as well globally. We have crop collapse happening everywhere. Same scenario: stomata shutting; not feeding; not absorbing carbon; not releasing oxygen.

This is a ubiquitous contamination. I think the first step is to let people know the facts you’ve laid out and to have a public debate. It always begins with words. Anything good starts there.

Tucker Carlson:

Where can people learn more? Could you end by telling us—speak slowly—where people can get more information on this?

Dane Wigington:

GeoengineeringWatch.org strives to be a data repository on this issue. The only way we can move this fight forward is to share credible data from a credible source, and we strive to be that source. I have one goal, one mission: I live for the day when what’s happening in our skies is fully exposed and halted—which, Tucker, I would argue we can only do from the inside out.

Legislation is good because it puts it on the radar, but it’s symbolic. They’re not going to stop DoD operations from that. Only by pushing this issue to the full light of day can we cause a shockwave around the world so that populations and countries all over the world understand what their governments have either actively or passively done to them without their knowledge or consent.

In doing so, our military brothers and sisters would hopefully awaken to what they’re doing to their countrymen and, one would hope, would stand down. I know we have the Milgram experiments as an example: most human beings, if told by someone they perceive as authority, will carry out almost any form of atrocity. We need to get past that.

If we can fully expose this, the fur will fly. I would argue we would alter the equation and drag many other issues with it—issues like 9/11 or “safe and effective”—because you can’t hide what’s happening in our sky. Many issues people can try to put in the rearview mirror; you can’t do that with this. It’s getting worse by the day; the damage is getting worse by the day.

If we share credible data from a credible source, that’s more effective at waking people up than running into the street, pointing at the sky, and ranting. If they can look at satellite images—which we capture the moment we see them on the NASA satellite feed—we capture them because they try to scrub them. We have satellite images beyond shocking; you don’t even need to know meteorology to know something very radical and very wrong is going on.

We put that on our printed materials, which we distribute to legislators; we supply them for activists and the public. There’s about a half-million of our 20-page booklets in circulation right now. We’re trying desperately to give visuals—which are a better key to the door. We’re trying desperately with legislators to not open up the whole climate-change front.

Stick to this issue. We can’t have a discussion about climate unless or until we deal with this first. We take this out of the equation; then we can assess where we’re at. By knowing how to play chess—knowing the chessboard—we need to play effectively and efficiently.

If we can do that and start spot-fires of awareness—ask others to do the same—we’ll put enough holes in the dam that those in power can’t plug the leaks, and we will push this issue to the full light of day. If we can do that, we will alter the equation. Time is not on our side. You can avoid a toxic medical concoction; you can avoid a lot of things. We have to breathe.

Every breath we take is filled with these nanoparticles. We have peer-reviewed studies to prove that, as well. In the case of nanoplastics—the climate science community is now starting to admit—they’re showing up in human brains, lungs—every human organ. We know these particles are not just a result of plastic decomposition in the environment, because our testing with RPI in New York conclusively proved the particles we found were manufactured.

They can tell with spectroscopy. Bottom line: we’re dealing with a ubiquitous contamination of the planet, and if we can’t breathe without inhaling that, the ramifications are beyond grave. This is a fight for life—right here, right now.

Tucker Carlson:

Are you spraying chemicals into the air without telling me, using my tax dollars? Simple question that I plan to start asking people in leadership positions. I don’t know how I made it this long without knowing all of this, but I’m grateful for this conversation, and I hope it sparks a national conversation and some outrage. Dane, thank you very much.

Dane Wigington:

Thank you, Tucker. Thank you so much for your voice. Thank you to your team. The importance of you and your team at this critical moment in human history cannot be overstated.

We at GeoengineeringWatch—and our platforms, which are much smaller than yours; a quarter-million followers is all, nothing compared to yours—but everybody in our ranks is 1,000% behind you, brother.

Tucker Carlson:

Well, that’s so nice. Thank you. We want to be helpful. I appreciate it. Thank you, Tucker.

And I’ll end with this….

Don’t forget that RFK Jr. CONFIRMED all of this several months ago:

RFK Jr. Explains EXACTLY How They’re Doing The Chemtrails and Why No “Huge Conspiracy” Is Necessary

THIS IS A RE-RELEASE OF A VERY IMPORTANT ARTICLE WE DID ON CHEMTRAILS RECENTLY.  PLEASE ENJOY AND SHARE.

I've been talking about chemtrails on this website for 10+ years....

And each time I do, there's always a small but very vocal group of people who have extremely strong cognitive dissonance reactions.

They get very angry with me, because their brain can't quite process the fact that they've (1) been lied to for decades, and (2) are being actively poisoned by their Government.

I get it, that's a very tough red pill to swallow.

But I've been right all along, and I want you to notice something: RFK Jr. was just asked about chemtrails AGAIN yesterday on Dr. Phil's show, and I want you to notice what he says in response....

He doesn't say "oh that's not real" or "that's just a conspiracy" or "I really don't have any information on that."

Nope.

None of that.

Instead, he confirms flat out that they're real and then he says he believes DARPA is doing the spraying.

He also says he's bringing on someone whose entire job will only be to investigate this and shut it down.

So to all the people who think this is just a huge conspiracy theory and you're going to go down in the comments section and type "bUt NOah theSE aRe just CONtrails not chEmtrails" derpy derpy derp....you're going to have to content with RFK Jr. who does not agree with you.

Also, there was one other thing that jumped off the screen to me....

Without even being asked, he confirmed something I've told you for YEARS now, and it's in response to the common question I often hear that goes like this:  "But Noah, how could such a huge conspiracy be kept quiet all these years?  If they're spraying every day and so many people are in on it, that means the pilots are in on it, the airports, the people who work on the planes, too many people are in on it for the truth to not come out!"

Have you heard that one?

The answer is very simple, and I've tried to tell you for years....

There is no longer any massive spraying jets hooked up to planes.

No, they knew that couldn't be kept quiet.  Not sustainable.

No, it's much simpler now.

Now they've found a way to just put the chemicals directly into the fuel and as the fuel burns and the exhaust comes out, the chemicals come out with it.

Simple!

And almost no one needs to be "in on it".

In fact, most people flying the planes or working on the planes probably don't know any different.

But don't take my word for it, take it from RFK Jr. himself.

Watch here:

TRANSCRIPT:

And my biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections
that are continuously peppered on us every day.

Bromium, aluminum, strontium — it's sprayed in our skies all day long.
And I know you've talked to Dane Wigington about this.
He seems to be one of the experts in the field.

Is there a question?
Yes. How do we stop it?

That is not happening in my agency.
We don't do that. It's done, we think, by DARPA.
And a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel.

Yes, sir. Those materials are put in jet fuel...

I'm going to do everything in my power to stop it.
We're bringing on somebody who's going to think only about that,
find out who's doing it,
and holding them.

Backup here with captions if needed:

And speaking of Dane Wigginton:

Destructive “Chemtrails” Finally Coming to Light – Dane Wigington

Destructive “Chemtrails” Finally Coming to Light – Dane Wigington

Credit to Greg Hunter, the USA Watchdog, for a fantastic interview with Dane Wigington shining the light on Chemtrails!

We've been sounding this alarm for almost 10 years and it's so great to see other freedom fighters doing the same thing.

As usual, Greg conducts a fantastic interview and does great work in getting this message out.

From USA Watchdog:

Climate engineering researcher Dane Wigington says it looks like the destructive climate engineering operation that has been going on for decades is finally coming to the attention of the public with new legislation happening in states like Tennessee. Terms like “chemtrails” are used to hide the massive harm being done to the climate.

Tennessee is taking action because the harm being done to the “public welfare” with everything from heavy metals, aluminum and nanoparticles being sprayed on everyone to manipulate the climate. Of course, there is no public discussion, let alone public approval, of this evil weather warfare that is well established climate Engineering science since just after WWII. With the Tennessee legislation, we may finally be getting enough public awareness to STOP spraying, poisoning and climate damage being done without public knowledge or permission.

Is the Tennessee climate engineering “ban” good news? Wigington explains, “This is extremely good news. The key point here is this raising awareness and credibility for this issue. Clearly, whatever one state passes over its airspace is not going to stop the fallout coming from upwind. You would have to ban this over the whole planet to stop theses toxic particulate matter from saturating all of us. That said, this is extremely important in raising awareness.

The Senate bill is 2691 and the House bill is 2063, and it’s being voted on tomorrow (Wednesday 3/27/24 in Tennessee) . . . . The interesting thing is all who are voting for this are Republicans, but this should not be a political issue. The reason why the Democrats are not voting for this is they believe anyone trying to bring attention to the climate engineering issue is somehow trying to dodge the fact that the climate is damaged. That is the furthest thing from the truth.

What we are saying at GeoEngineeringWatch.org is how can there be any legitimate discussion about climate anything without addressing this issue first and foremost. . . .On the current course, no one gets out alive. I know that is an incredibly hard pill to swallow, but it is the fact of the matter. . . . What does that mean for all of us? Do we sit down and do nothing? No. We try to bring this issue (Geoengineering) to light, which is, at this moment in time, the single most destructive factor of all human activity.

It is the single most destructive problem we face short of nuclear cataclysm. If together we can expose this and stop it and allow the planet to respond to the damage done with whatever life support systems that are left . . . people need to wake up while we can still make a difference. We are running out of time.”

Please watch the full interview:

Now let's go deep into the murky world of chemtrails, shall we?

Keep reading....

Chemtrails Confirmed: They're Real and Very Dangerous!

I've been covering chemtrails for a long time on this channel.

Many, many people have woken up as a direct result of our coverage.

More on that below.

In what used to be maybe a 50/50 response, I'd say we're now closer to 75% who have taken the red pill and are pissed off at what's happening in the skies above them.

But we still have maybe 25% of the people who refuse to admit it.

Most of that is cognitive dissonance.

It's much easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled.

Why?

Because then they've played the fool for years or even decades.

Much easier to stick your head in the sand, stick your fingers in your ears, close your eyes and say "I SEE NOTHING!"

Well, sorry that doesn't work for me.

It may be a bitter pill to swallow...

You may not like it...

It might piss you off....

But we need to have a mass awakening.

So for all the holdouts, all I can tell you is watch this video.

It shows all the patents they've been granted.

It shows close up the planes turning on and off the sprayers in mid flight.

It goes deep into the science and shows the heavy levels of the particulate found in our air.

It's all in here.

One of the best documentaries I've ever seen.

I know we'll wake up a bunch of new people with this one.

I also know there will still be a few people like this, even in spite of video evidence:

And to those people I remind you of this quote:

"There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep man in everlasting ignorance – That principle is contempt prior to investigation.”

Watch here:

Backup for safe keeping on Rumble here:

I could use your help...

I've started a new website called ChemtrailsExposed.com and it's quickly becoming the largest database of Chemtrails on the Internet!

Check out some of the recent posts, these will make your blood boil...

Chemtrails ALL over the world!

And this:

Always in a cross-hatch pattern for max dispersion:

Even in France!

We recently added a World Map and we're dropping a pin in every spot where Chemtrails have been spotted.

Will you please add yours?

VIEW THE WORLD MAP HERE

Now let's keep going...

People Waking Up To Chemtrails Everywhere!

One of my proudest accomplishments here at WeLoveTrump has been getting hundreds, thousands, millions (?) to wake up to the reality of chemtrails.

The reality of the air above them literally being sprayed and poisoned.

To.  Just.  Look.  Up.

And it's working!

Check out this latest email I received (all personal information redacted for privacy):

Here's one of the videos they sent me:

It wasn't too long ago that this would have gone completely un-noticed...

Or people would have argued with me that it was "normal".

Now we're finally seeing red-pill moments happening all over the country!

Here's more:

I just saw video of the WORST chemtrails I have ever seen.

Big thanks to a reader in Arizona (name withheld) for getting out his phone and snagging the video.

We truly have the best community here at WeLoveTrump...and we're 4-6 million strong each month and growing!

I'll show you the video in just a minute, but first I want to note that this is not that far away from Maricopa County, and may in fact have looked exactly the same in Maricopa County if you were standing there.

So I just have one question: is Arizona under attack right now and is it related to the vote count which is still going on in Maricopa County?

Is this a fight over Kari Lake?

Think chemtrails can't possibly be related?

I'm not so sure.

This is a pattern I've seen over and over again.

Just like when they used engineered weather to destroy Florida with Hurricanes (yes, they did) are they using chemtrails to attack Arizona?

How does it work?

What's the end game?

I don't know all the specifics, but I know breathing in those heavy metals from the air makes people angry, agitated, irritated, dumbed down?  Brain fog?

Is this all a plot to continue to create chaos down there?

All I'm saying is don't rule it out.

Now check out this video on Rumble from my on-the-ground reporter:

Ever seen that many?

All lined up?

Perfectly in succession?

Two planes just going up and back, back and forth, creating perfect lines all across the sky.

Don't tell me these are contrails created by normal planes flying.

If these were normal planes flying, it must be the flight from hell because they keep flying and getting no where!

It's like when you mow your yard...up and back, back and forth, side to side.

That's exactly what they're doing up there.

Just like when you mow your lawn using your riding mower, you're not riding that mower because you're trying to get to the store.

You're trying to criss-cross your whole yard and cover every square inch.

Same.

Thing.

Here.

Here was California just a few weeks ago:

FROM A READER: Chemtrails EXPOSED In California!

I've said it before and I'll say it again...

We have the BEST people here in the WeLoveTrump community!

Smart...

Bold...

Brave...

Strong...

And people who use the brain God gave them to think for themselves.

I started covering chemtrails here about 5 years ago, and when I started most people had no idea what they were.

Most people had severe Cognitive Dissonance on the topic, which is understandable.

But the more we've presented the evidence (more of that below), the more people have slowly woken up.

And LOOKED up!

Looked up to the sky above them and sometimes begrudgingly had to admit: this is not normal.

This is not what the skies looked like 30 years ago.

This is bad, very bad,

People like this reader who just emailed me today.

Name and email address blocked out for privacy, but I wanted to share her wonderful message:

And here are the images:

Notice all the X patterns.

Always sprayed in a cross hatch!

This wasn't the first time we've had a great reader report, waking up to the reality of Chemtrails.

Remember this?

MUST SEE: Chemtrails EXPOSED In Arizona!

This article really pumps me up!

Why?

Because people are waking up all across this great nation!

I publish each day from America's Heartland but I get emails from readers all across our country every single day (actually, from all across the world).

And what really pumps me up is to see people doing their own research, thinking for themselves, and then sending me emails with their thoughts...

Or with photos and videos!

And that's what I have to share with you right now.

We've been covering the TRUTH behind Chemtrails for a longtime here at WeLoveTrump.

It's always baffled me how they can literally be spraying heavy chemicals like aluminum and barium in the skies right above us, and some people don't notice!

Or refuse to even question what may be happening.

Because it's easier to just ignore it than to really consider the idea that our government and/or the "power elite" are literally spraying poisons into our air for us to breathe.

Perhaps it's why cancer has skyrocketed?

Why autism has skyrocketed?

Why dementia has skyrocketed?

Heavy metals in the brain?

Hmmm....

Well, I was so pumped today to get an email from a reader who sent me this video from Casa Grande, AZ capturing some of the absolute worst Chemtrails I have ever seen!

They shot a video and sent it to me!

FOLKS....we are winning!

We are winning hearts and minds and we are waking people up!

They're waking up and realizing the skies NEVER looked like this 25 years ago.

Do you remember?

Think back and ask yourself if you EVER saw this 25 years ago?

Nope.

You saw blue skies and clouds.

Friends, these are NOT clouds.

Massive lines that stretch for edge to edge in the sky?

That's not a cloud.

And here are THREE of them lined up in a perfect line.

We don't know what happened next, but based on my experience, after they lined up these three parallel chemtrail lines, the planes then flew back in a cross-hatch pattern to get maximum distribution.

Anyway, check out this awesome video that a reader sent me (you can hear him say "Hey Noah!") and gave me permission to upload and post here on Rumble:

And now for everyone who is about to tell me all the reasons why this is normal, I humbly ask you to keep reading...

Sorry folks, you used to be able to give me any number of excuses and justifications claiming that I was wrong and these were not chemtrails, but you no longer have that option.

You no longer have that luxury.

Because just last week, the White House itself came out and said POINT BLANK....we are spraying chemicals into the air.

We call it "stratospheric aerosol injections" and we've been doing it for 20 years.

Oh, and that's not some fringe website...that was reported on CNBC.

I have all the details here if you have the courage to deal with your own cognitive dissonance and read it:

Crimes Against Humanity: CNBC Just ADMITTED Chemtrails Are Real

STANDARD DISCLAIMER: this article will trigger some with extreme cognitive dissonance.  Beware.  

I've been reporting on chemtrails for a LONG time on this website.

And I always get a few categories of responses...

Response #1 - people who see the chemtrails with their own eyes just like I do and know this is NOT natural and something is very wrong here.  Very bad idea to be doing this.

This group is growing and I would say is now well over 50%.

The next responses are the people suffering from cognitive dissonance.

I get it.

It's a very hard red pill to swallow to think your government is spraying heavy metals into the air (that then fall down and we breath them in).

A likely contributor to all the sickness and disease and dis-ease we all feel?

Very likely.

So Response #2 goes like this - these are nothing more that contrails from airplanes.  Just a jet stream.

The only problem with this is two-fold: One, contrails do exist, but they evaporate very quickly and don't stay in the air.

See the big picture at the top of this article?

Those are crossing chemtrail lines (they love to spray them in X or crosshatch patterns) and those have been in the sky often for over and hour long.  Not contrails.  Not dissipating.

The other big problem with Response #2?

CNBC just told you that chemtrails are real, and I'll cover that in just a moment.

Response #3 - they can't be chemtrails because every pilot and airport in the world would have to be "in on it" and that's just not possible.  Plus no one could be that evil.  I just don't want to believe it so I refuse to even consider it.

Otherwise known as the Ostrich approach.

Refusing to consider truth does not stop it from being truth, it just means you may have buried your head in the sand.

Now let's go to CNBC and the White House, who both now fully admit this is happening.

They call them "stratospheric aerosol injections".

We've reported on that term for a long time -- John Brennan himself admitted it about 10 years ago at the CFR.

But now even CNBC is covering it.

Take a look:

I love this quote from the CNBC article:

Read that quote again:

"Because it has the potential to affect the entire glove, it often gets the most attention."

Yeah, you don't say!!!

WAKE UP PEOPLE!

Yeah, spraying heavy chemicals into our skies -- into the air we literally breathe -- certainly should get the most attention!

That's why we've been shouting it from the rooftops on this website.

CNBC also tells us this all started as early as 1965:

Another quote is even more mindblowing...

Check this out:

For all the deniers and Ostrich's out there, please READ THIS AGAIN very carefully!

Quote:

"This isn't something new...we're already doing it!"

And then even more mindblowing:

"We don't understand what we're doing."

Put it all together folks, and they just told you this:  We've been spraying heavy chemicals into your air for decades.  It's real.  It's not new.  We're already doing it.  And honestly we don't even really know what we're doing or the longterm affects."

This is outright criminal.

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

Yes, it's that serious.

Here is just a portion of that CNBC article (read the full article here: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/13/what-is-solar-geoengineering-sunlight-reflection-risks-and-benefits.html):

The White House is coordinating a five-year research plan to study ways of modifying the amount of sunlight that reaches the earth to temper the effects of global warming, a process sometimes called solar geoengineering or sunlight reflection.

The research plan will assess climate interventions, including spraying aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight back into space, and should include goals for research, what’s necessary to analyze the atmosphere, and what impact these kinds of climate interventions may have on Earth, according to the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy. Congress directed the research plan be produced in its spending plan for 2022, which President Joe Biden signed in March.

Some of the techniques, such as spraying sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere, are known to have harmful effects on the environment and human health. But scientists and climate leaders who are concerned that humanity will overshoot its emissions targets say research is important to figure out how best to balance these risks against a possibly catastrophic rise in the Earth’s temperature.

Getting ready to research a topic is a very preliminary step, but it’s notable the White House is formally engaging with what has largely been seen as the stuff of dystopian fantasy. In Kim Stanley Robinson’s science fiction novel, “The Ministry for the Future,” a heat wave in India kills 20 million people and out of desperation, India decides to implement its own strategy of limiting the sunlight that gets to Earth.

Chris Sacca, the founder of climate tech investment fund Lowercarbon Capital, said it’s prudent for the White House to be spearheading the research effort.

“Sunlight reflection has the potential to safeguard the livelihoods of billions of people, and it’s a sign of the White House’s leadership that they’re advancing the research so that any future decisions can be rooted in science not geopolitical brinkmanship,” Sacca told CNBC. (Sacca has donated money to support research in the area, but said he has “zero financial interests beyond philanthropy” in the idea and does not think there should be private business models in the space, he told CNBC.)

Harvard professor David Keith, who first worked on the topic in 1989, said it’s being taken much more seriously now. He points to formal statements of support for researching sunlight reflection from the Environmental Defense Fund, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and the Natural Resources Defense Council, and the creation of a new group he advises called the Climate Overshoot Commission, an international group of scientists and lawmakers that’s evaluating climate interventions in preparation for a world that warms beyond what the Paris Climate Accord recommended.

To be clear, nobody is saying sunlight-reflection modification is the solution to climate change. Reducing emissions remains the priority.

“You cannot judge what the country does on solar-radiation modification without looking at what it is doing in emission reductions, because the priority is emission reductions,” said Janos Pasztor, executive director of the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative. “Solar-radiation modification will never be a solution to the climate crisis.”

Three ways to reduce sunlight

The idea of sunlight reflection first appeared prominently in a 1965 report to President Lyndon B. Johnson, entitled “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment,” Keith told CNBC. The report floated the idea of spreading particles over the ocean at a cost of $100 per square mile. A one percent change in the reflectivity of the Earth would cost $500 million per year, which does “not seem excessive,” the report said, “considering the extraordinary economic and human importance of climate.”

The estimated price tag has gone up since then. The current estimate is that it would cost $10 billion per year to run a program that cools the Earth by 1 degree Celsius, said Edward A. Parson, a professor of environmental law at UCLA’s law school. But that figure is seen to be remarkably cheap compared to other climate change mitigation initiatives.

A landmark report released in March 2021 from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine addressed three kinds of solar geoengineering: stratospheric aerosol injection, marine cloud brightening, and cirrus cloud thinning.

Stratospheric aerosol injection would involve flying aircraft into the stratosphere, or between 10 miles and 30 miles skyward, and spraying a fine mist that would hang in the air, reflecting some of the sun’s radiation back into space.

“The stratosphere is calm, and things stay up there for a long time,” Parson told CNBC. “The atmospheric life of stuff that’s injected in the stratosphere is between six months and two years.”

Stratospheric aerosol injection “would immediately take the high end off hot extremes,” Parson said. And also it would “pretty much immediately” slow extreme precipitation events, he said.

“The top-line slogan about stratospheric aerosol injection, which I wrote in a paper more than 10 years ago — but it’s still apt — is fast, cheap and imperfect. Fast is crucial. Nothing else that we do for climate change is fast. Cheap, it’s so cheap,” Parson told CNBC.

“And it’s not imperfect because we haven’t got it right yet. It’s imperfect because the imperfection is embedded in the way it works. The same reason it’s fast is the reason that it’s imperfect, and there’s no way to get around that.”

One option for an aerosol is sulfur dioxide, the cooling effects of which are well known from volcanic eruptions. The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, for instance, spewed thousands of tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, causing global temperatures to drop temporarily by about 1 degree Fahrenheit, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

My friend Christopher Greene had more on the story:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_oVj2GGHzc

But here's the good news...because our reporting has been so honest and accurate, we are winning!

People are waking up!

We are truly are winning hearts and opening minds.

People are finally looking up and seeing what has been obvious in the skies above them for years.

Like this email I just got from a reader (name withheld for privacy).

This is so encouraging!

Read this:

And then check out the photos they sent me...

Pretty obvious, isn't it?

THANK YOU so much for your email and for sharing your story with me!

Tell others!

And if you need more evidence and more things to show people, keep reading and show them this article.

Because I have video upon video of them in their own words admitting what they are doing.

Keep reading...

👇

Just yesterday I brought you an update from The Guardian that not only admitted to "cloud seeding" happening for years, but it explained in explicit detail that it's done by spraying heavy chemicals into the air.

I'll leave that research below.

But now I have a second video to share with you on the same topic thanks to a reader who sent it to me.

Look how old this video is and then realize they've been admitting it even back then.

Stunning, watch here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7G8-eCwK0M

Backup on Rumble:

And now here is my research from just yesterday, from The Guardian.

I know some of you have such serious cognitive dissonance that you can't physically bring yourself to look up in the sky and see the chemicals being sprayed in the air above you.

That's ok, but I'm going to continue reporting on it regardless.

We've covered this topic many times and provided countless evidence (beyond just using your eyes and looking up!) all of which I will copy down below in case you want more reading.

But for now I want to talk about the latest confirmation: China has now admitted to "cloud seeding".

I can already hear some of your thoughts in your head: "THAT'S NOT CHEMTRAILS!"

How do you think they accomplish the cloud seeding?

Rain dances?

Sorry folks...it's by spraying large amounts of chemicals into the sky to form the clouds.

Here it is in black & white literally admitted verbatim to chemtails -- from The Guardian:

On Wednesday, China’s south-western province of Sichuan said it would ration power supplies to homes, offices and shopping malls, after having already ordered producers of energy-intensive metals and fertiliser to curb operations.

In what appears to be an official call to cut electricity use, government offices were asked to set air conditioners no lower than 26C (79F) and use the stairs instead of lifts, the Sichuan Daily said.

Fountains, light shows and commercial activities after dark are to be suspended, it added.

On Wednesday, the central province of Hubei became the latest to unveil an effort to induce rainfall, by sending airplanes to fire the chemical silver iodide into the clouds.

Other regions on the Yangtze have also launched “cloud seeding” programmes, but with cloud cover too thin, operations in some parched areas have stayed on standby.

Power shortages have also prompted several companies in the sprawling Chongqing region bordering Sichuan to say they would suspend production.

I bolded it, but let's just read it all again together, shall we?

QUOTE:

"BY SENDING AIRPLAINES TO FIRE THE CHEICAL SILVER IODIDE INTO THE CLOUDS."

Folks, what more do you need to see?

They're real and they're very bad for humanity.

The good news is MANY people are waking up and catching on...like Tucker:

And this Raymond dude:

And this sums it up perfectly:

Want more?

Let's keep going, this was just the tip of the iceberg!

Why do the so-called "Elites" seem to hate the sun so much?

They constantly warn of "global warming"...

They are obsessed with ways to block out the sun...

Which only tells me one thing: the Sun must be VERY important.

And never has a photo been more significant than one I snapped recently.

The photo you see above is a photo I actually took myself...two MASSIVE chemtrails in an "X" formation and it just so happened when I snapped the shot that they "X'ed" out the sun.

Fitting, isn't it?

This makes me so furious, here's what they are doing, it's really almost beyond comprehension...

First, you have to understand these are NOT "frozen water vapors" like they try to claim.

Those are real and they are called "contrails" short for "condensation trails" and they are very short behind a plane and evaporate quickly.

Chemtrails are different.

They don't go away quickly.

They grow and spread out over the entire sky over the course of an afternoon.

They're often sprayed in X or cross-hatch patterns to get maximum coverage in the sky.

And...they contain heavy metals like aluminum, barium and now confirmed to have graphene.

All extremely toxic to humans.

I saw this on Twitter today and I was so encouraged to see other people getting it!

And this:

And this:

Smart people!

Now here's the most insidious part: these evil "elites" are spraying these day after day after day literally poisoning the air we breathe and then they have the GALL to claim that humans are destroying the ozone layer by our use of carbon-based fossil fuels.

It's true that humans are destroying the environment, but it's not just by living.

It's this small group of elite sickos who are literally spraying the skies day after day with toxic heavy metals!

Then they claim we have to join the Paris Accord and give up all our freedoms and pay yet another tax (a "carbon tax" -- what a joke!).

It's the same game plan they run over and over.

Take COVID.

Cook up COVID in a biolab in Ukraine or China, release it to the public, use the MSM to hype it up and work everyone into a panic, and then tell everyone the only cure is to take their poison vaccine.

It's the same cycle over and over and over again....

THEY create a problem, they use their propaganda machines in the MSM to work everyone into a panic, then THEY roll out their solution, which is usually worse than the problem!

Sick, sick, sick stuff!

Sean over at SGT Report just had Dane Wigington back on his show to talk more about this.

They go into everything in much greater detail and I really want you to watch this video.

Watch and then share.

We have to wake people up to what is literally being poisoned in the skies right above them!

And yes, they answer all the common questions like:

Aren't they poisoning themselves too?  Why do it?

How do we know what metals are in the spray?

What video evidence do we have of the spraying?

Isn't this just a "contrail"?  (Answer: No!)

Watch the full interview here on Rumble:

Now let's dig in even more...

Here are a few more photos I took from a couple weeks ago while I was enjoying a nice afternoon at the park with my kids.

The day started off with big, beautiful blue skies...not a cloud in the sky.

And then, this started happening:

There still wasn't a cloud in the sky, but there these things!

Chemtrails.

I just have to wonder what most people think when they look up and see this...

Serious question.

Here are the options I've come up with so far:

Option 1- they don't even think about it.  Never even occurs to them.

Option 2- they think they are normal condensation trails ("contrails") caused by planes.

Option 3- they know something is wrong but don't know what or what they can do about it.

My hunch is over half the population falls into Option 1.

They are literally spraying heavy chemicals into the skies above us -- into the air we breathe -- and I have to believe if the majority of the people understood that and thought about it, there would be hell to pay.

But as it stands, I almost never hear anyone even question it.

Then I think there is a group of people like this Harvard Professor below, who I think fall into Option 2.

It can't possibly be a "conspiracy" (even though all the other conspiracies seem to be coming true before our eyes).

No, they say -- all explainable by science!

Besides, they say, the government couldn't possibly keep something like that a secret!

And all the commercial airline pilots and crew couldn't keep it a secret either, they say!

Watch the short video and then I'll give my reaction:

Ok, so my take?

First, "compartmentalization" explains most of what the government keeps secret.

There are very, very few people who know the "whole picture" and the whole plan of any operation.

Everyone else just works on their small part and never has any idea or reason to question how it all fits together.

Second, no one who believes these are chemical trails believes they are attached to commercial airplanes.  That's just stupid and an intentional red herring to alter the argument.

No, the people who believe these are chemical trails believe these are government planes or private planes or both.

Again, compartmentalized by a very small subset of people and probably people who get very specific and limited orders and are not told anything further.

Now let's explore some more pictures and videos and you tell me if these look normal to you:

Or this:

Or this:

https://twitter.com/Urylle/status/1306631683664490498

Or this:

My friends, these are NOT normal!

And they're not just "condensation trails" either.

Let's take a moment to address that.

Condensation trails DO exist and are normal.

In fact, back in the 1980s I remember seeing a lot of them.

I even remember as a kid watching them go across the sky and how quickly they disappeared.

Read that last part again: they ALWAYS quickly dissipated!

I even remember holding my finger up in the sky to track how quickly they would dissipate and go away completely (hey, we didn't have anything else to do, there was no internet!).

But that's a key point.

They NEVER lasted for longer than a very short stretch of the sky and they never spread out over time over the course of a whole afternoon.

Contrails exist, but they are VERY different from chemtrails.

Chemtrails have heavy chemicals designed to stay in the air and spread out.

They don't dissipate.

They expand.

Big difference.

Now, here's the real kicker...

Would you be surprised to know that the Deep State doesn't even try to hide it?

They ADMIT it!

I find it so hilarious when people who think it's a "conspiracy theory" try to defend them, and I want to just ask them....you do know that even the Deep Staters like John Brennan are admitting it?

Right?

Right.....?

The thing is, they don't call them "chemtrails".

No, that would be too obvious.

They call them "stratospheric aerosol injections".

Which is a super fancy way of saying chemtrails.

Literally injecting heavy metals into the sky.

Other times they call them "geo-engineering".

They all mean the same thing.

Here is the full video:

And because that will almost certainly be deleted by YouTube as soon as I post this, I made a backup.

Here it is on Rumble:

And confirmed here too:

https://twitter.com/Oval_Glass/status/1180900077641973762

More:

MIT admitting it too:

And this:

And here:

The Deep State likes to call stuff like this "hidden in plain sight".

Or is that in "plane" sight?

Would you please help us and share this everywhere?

Let's get the truth out!

It absolutely boggles my mind how they are doing this every single day in the skies above us and it's on display literally for the whole world to see and most people either don't see it, don't understand it, don't question it or just don't want to take the red pill and wake up.

Sorry folks, it's time to wake up.

All the B.S. about "clean air" and the B.S. Paris Accord and all that garbage and in the meantime they are LITERALLY spraying the air with toxic metals on a DAILY basis.

Makes me furious.

It should make every single American furious.

It's time to act.

But I want to know what you think...

View the original article here.

Trending on Twitter

TammaroDee avatar;
11h 1996657862169571528

1/
15 pics + video today. West of Tampa Florida. Nothing edited. ☀️so blinding white I had to turn the exposure down full. You can see in [blank] shot just how bright the chem halo is! #geoengineering #nexrad #chemtrails #haarp #weatherwarfare #skywatchers

Image for the Tweet beginning: 1/ 15 pics + video today. Twitter feed image.
Image for the Tweet beginning: 1/ 15 pics + video today. Twitter feed image.
Image for the Tweet beginning: 1/ 15 pics + video today. Twitter feed image.
Image for the Tweet beginning: 1/ 15 pics + video today. Twitter feed image.
majortomfree avatar;
15h 1996598902464676246

#chemtrails Jupiter, Florida today. And otherwise beautiful day thank you #billgates #usagovernment

Image for the Tweet beginning: #chemtrails Jupiter, Florida today. And Twitter feed image.
taraisvegan avatar;
15h 1996594052662247610

🤔 I thought Florida was no longer doing this? #Florida #chemtrails @PeggyHall

Image for the Tweet beginning: 🤔 I thought Florida was Twitter feed image.
Pureblood516 avatar;
17h 1996562634770923664

Over my house this morning. STOP POISONING US!! (Over the Tampa Bay area, Florida) @GovRonDeSantis @realDonaldTrump #Chemtrails

Image for the Tweet beginning: Over my house this morning. Twitter feed image.
Image for the Tweet beginning: Over my house this morning. Twitter feed image.
Image for the Tweet beginning: Over my house this morning. Twitter feed image.
Image for the Tweet beginning: Over my house this morning. Twitter feed image.
Load More